Are the University Hospitals in Puerto Rico following Current Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening?
PDF

Keywords

Abnormal cytology
guidelines
ASCCP

How to Cite

Méndez, K., Rodríguez, N., Sánchez, I., Lozada, Y., Piñero, I., Donate, D., & Romaguera, J. (2015). Are the University Hospitals in Puerto Rico following Current Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening?. Puerto Rico Health Sciences Journal, 34(3). Retrieved from https://prhsj.rcm.upr.edu/index.php/prhsj/article/view/1007

Abstract

Objective: Cervical cancer is the fifth most common cancer among women in Puerto Rico (PR). Information about which obstetricians and gynecologists in PR are following current cervical cytology guidelines is not available. Our two objectives were to determine whether current guidelines for abnormal cervical cytology management were being followed adequately by OB-GYN residents and faculty at 3 university hospitals and, in addition, to evaluate the knowledge of the current guidelines that is possessed by these individuals. Methods: A retrospective medical record review (records from January 2009 through December 2010) of patients with abnormal cervical cytology results (n = 166) to evaluate the management they were given and a cross-sectional survey of OB-GYN residents (n = 34) and faculty (n = 46) to evaluate their knowledge of cervical cytology guidelines were both performed. Results: One hundred and sixty-six medical records were reviewed. The level of management for 45% of the patients was found to have been optimal.”Thirty-three percent were lost to follow-up. Eleven percent of the patients were managed sub optimally and the management of 12% of the patients was considered to have been poor. The survey showed that the faculty were less updated with regard to current guidelines for the management of cervical cytology than were the residents. Study limitations were the lack of electronic medical records in the hospital —which makes access to patient information more difficult—and the low response rate of the faculty. Conclusion: OB-GYN physicians and residents were not consistent with their management, according to current guidelines, of cervical cytological abnormalities. The high-risk nature of the patients and their poor adherence to treatment (loss to follow-up) may have been the cause of this inconsistency. Meetings aimed at addressing the lack of compliance by local OB-GYN physicians with the guidelines for cervical cancer screening have been Better screening strategies are also needed if we are to improve patient compliance in our population.
PDF
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).